Login to upload, edit, or delete media.
Home Rich Text Editor modea
|
Company |
Metric |
Current (Q1) |
Previous Year (YoY) |
Performance |
Category |
|
R P P INFRA PROJECTS |
Net Profit |
₹108M |
₹165M |
-34.5% decline |
Bad |
|
Revenue |
₹3.47B |
₹3.36B |
+3.3% growth |
Good |
|
|
NITCO |
EBITDA |
₹496M gain |
₹108M loss |
Turned profitable |
Very Good |
|
EBITDA Margin |
32.29% |
- |
Strong margin |
Very Good |
|
|
Net Profit |
₹475M |
₹435M loss |
Massive turnaround |
Very Good |
|
|
Revenue |
₹1.5B |
₹702M |
+113.7% growth |
Very Good |
|
|
ASHOKA BUILDCON |
Net Profit |
₹2.17B |
₹1.5B |
+44.7% growth |
Very Good |
|
Revenue |
₹18.87B |
₹24.7B |
-23.6% decline |
Bad |
|
|
HI-TECH GEARS |
Net Profit |
₹60M |
₹142M |
-57.7% decline |
Very Bad |
|
Revenue |
₹2.1B |
₹2.55B |
-17.6% decline |
Bad |
|
|
EBITDA |
₹261M |
₹410M |
-36.3% decline |
Bad |
|
|
EBITDA Margin |
12.39% |
16.07% |
-3.68pp decline |
Bad |
|
|
SOM DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES |
EBITDA |
₹703.5M |
₹642M |
+9.6% growth |
Good |
|
EBITDA Margin |
7.95% |
6.34% |
+1.61pp improvement |
Good |
|
|
KRSNAA DIAGNOSTICS |
EBITDA |
₹513M |
₹427M |
+20.1% growth |
Very Good |
|
EBITDA Margin |
26.58% |
25.09% |
+1.49pp improvement |
Very Good |
· FII Activity: Net selling of ₹1,202.65 Crore
· DII Activity: Net buying of ₹5,972.36 Crore
· Net Impact: Strong domestic institutional support offsetting foreign outflows
· NITCO: Complete turnaround story
· ASHOKA BUILDCON: Strong profit growth despite revenue decline
· KRSNAA DIAGNOSTICS: Consistent growth with healthy margins
· R P P INFRA: Revenue growth positive
· SOM DISTILLERIES: Steady EBITDA growth and margin expansion
· R P P INFRA: Significant profit decline
· ASHOKA BUILDCON: Revenue contraction
· HI-TECH GEARS: Revenue and margin decline
· HI-TECH GEARS: Severe profit decline across all metrics
1. Mixed sector performance with construction and diagnostics showing strength
2. NITCO's remarkable turnaround from loss to significant profit
3. Margin pressure evident in manufacturing (Hi-Tech Gears)
4. Domestic institutional support providing market stability
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
Performance Category |
Analysis |
|
Cello World |
• Net Profit: ₹730M vs ₹826M (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹5.29B vs ₹5B (YoY) ↑ |
GOOD |
Revenue growth positive but profit declined. Mixed signals. |
|
Indian Hotels |
• Acquiring 51% stake in Ank Hotels for ₹1.10B<br>• Acquiring 51% stake in Pride Hospitality for ₹940M |
VERY GOOD |
Strong expansion strategy with major acquisitions. Growth-focused. |
|
ESAB India |
• Net Profit: ₹409M vs ₹445M (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹3.5B vs ₹3.3B (YoY) ↑ |
GOOD |
Revenue growth but slight profit decline. Stable performance. |
|
Marathon NextGen Realty |
• EBITDA: ₹309M vs ₹529M (YoY) ↓<br>• EBITDA Margin: 21.96% vs 32.63% (YoY) ↓ |
BAD |
Significant decline in both EBITDA and margins. Concerning trend. |
|
WIM Plast |
• Net Profit: ₹169M vs ₹145.1M (YoY) ↑<br>• Revenue: ₹899M vs ₹903M (YoY) ↓ |
GOOD |
Profit growth despite slight revenue decline. Improved efficiency. |
|
Praj Industries |
• Order Book: ₹3,254 Crore<br>• Expanding into SAF, CBG, and engineering exports<br>• Debt-free sustainable expansion |
VERY GOOD |
Strong order book, diversification strategy, and debt-free status. |
|
Allcargo Terminals |
• EBITDA: ₹346M vs ₹300M (YoY) ↑<br>• EBITDA Margin: 18.48% vs 15.83% (YoY) ↑ |
VERY GOOD |
Strong growth in both EBITDA and margins. Solid operational improvement. |
|
Brigade Hotel Ventures |
• Plans to double portfolio to 3,300 rooms<br>• Expanding in luxury and upper-midscale markets<br>• Focus on sustainability |
VERY GOOD |
Aggressive expansion plans with strategic focus. Growth-oriented. |
|
RPP Infra Projects |
• EBITDA: ₹200M vs ₹250M (YoY) ↓<br>• EBITDA Margin: 5.76% vs 7.44% (YoY) ↓ |
BAD |
Declining EBITDA and margins. Operational challenges evident. |
|
Embassy Developments |
• Net Loss: ₹1.66B vs Profit ₹1.2B (YoY) ↓<br>• Revenue: ₹6.8B vs ₹4.9B (YoY) ↑ |
VERY BAD |
Massive swing from profit to loss despite revenue growth. Major concerns. |
· Indian Hotels, Praj Industries, Allcargo Terminals, Brigade Hotel Ventures
· Cello World, ESAB India, WIM Plast
· Marathon NextGen Realty, RPP Infra Projects
· Embassy Developments
1. Hotel/Hospitality Sector: Shows strong performance with expansion strategies
2. Infrastructure/Real Estate: Mixed results with some significant challenges
3. Industrial/Manufacturing: Generally stable with modest growth
4. Revenue vs Profit Disconnect: Several companies showing revenue growth but profit challenges
|
Company |
Performance Category |
Key Metrics |
Reasoning |
|
Tilaknagar Industries |
Very Good |
Profit: +121% YoY, Revenue: +30% YoY |
Exceptional profit growth with strong revenue increase |
|
Heubach Colorants |
Very Good |
Profit: +229% YoY, Revenue: +21% YoY |
Outstanding profit jump with solid revenue growth |
|
Time Technoplast |
Good |
Profit: +20% YoY, Revenue: +8% YoY, EBITDA: +12% YoY |
Consistent growth across all metrics, plus bonus shares |
|
Websol Energy Systems |
Good |
600 MW expansion, high ROE, leading margins |
Strong expansion with solid fundamentals |
|
KNR Constructions |
Good |
15-20% growth target, ₹6,963 cr order book, debt-free |
Strong order book and financial position |
|
Krsnaa Diagnostics |
Good |
Aggressive expansion plan, targeting double-digit growth |
Ambitious expansion strategy |
|
Bata India |
Neutral/Good |
Positive consumption outlook |
Forward-looking positive sentiment |
|
Titagarh Rail Systems |
Bad |
Profit: -40% YoY, Revenue: -25% YoY |
Significant decline in both profit and revenue |
|
Company |
Category |
Key Metrics |
Performance Summary |
|
Shaily Engineering Plastics |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.45B vs ₹1.79B (+37% YoY)<br>• EBITDA: ₹683M vs ₹354M (+93% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Margin: 27.7% vs 19.75% (+8pp) |
Outstanding growth across all metrics. Massive EBITDA growth with significant margin expansion |
|
VST Tillers Tractors |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Net Profit: ₹446M vs ₹228M (+96% YoY) |
Exceptional profit growth - nearly doubled year-over-year |
|
Websol Energy System |
VERY GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.2B vs ₹1.12B (+96% YoY) |
Outstanding revenue growth - nearly doubled |
|
Enviro Infra Engineers |
GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Revenue: ₹2.4B vs ₹2.05B (+17% YoY) |
Solid steady growth in revenue |
|
MAN Industries |
GOOD ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
• Net Profit: ₹276M vs ₹191M (+45% YoY)<br>• Revenue: ₹7.4B vs ₹7.49B (-1% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Margin: 6.62% vs 5.04% (+1.6pp) |
Good profit growth and margin improvement despite flat revenue |
|
Lodha Developers |
NEUTRAL ⭐⭐⭐ |
• NCD Limit: ₹30B → ₹50B |
Corporate action - expanding debt capacity (could be positive for growth funding) |
|
Exicom Tele Systems |
VERY BAD ❌❌❌ |
• Net Loss: ₹831M vs Profit ₹182M<br>• Revenue: ₹2.05B vs ₹2.5B (-18% YoY)<br>• EBITDA Loss: ₹386M vs Gain ₹248M |
Complete turnaround to losses with declining revenue and negative EBITDA |
· VERY GOOD (3 companies): Exceptional growth metrics
· GOOD (2 companies): Solid positive performance
· NEUTRAL (1 company): Corporate action
· VERY BAD (1 company): Significant deterioration
Very Good Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
PATEL ENGINEERING |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹810M vs ₹547M (YoY) |
|
DHUNSERI VENTURES |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹835M vs ₹410M (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 48.12% vs 25.4% (YoY) |
|
TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹1.46B vs ₹1.02B (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 38.88% vs 24.86% (YoY) <br> Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹918M vs ₹554M (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹3.75B vs ₹4.1B (YoY) |
|
AWFIS SPACE SOLUTIONS |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹1.27B vs ₹791M (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 37.82% vs 30.69% (YoY) |
|
SJVN |
Q1 EBITDA: ₹7.42B vs ₹6.7B (YoY) <br> Q1 EBITDA Margin: 80.9% vs 76.7% (YoY) |
Good Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
KAMDHENU |
Q1 SL Net Profit: ₹214M vs ₹154M (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹1.96B vs ₹1.8B (YoY) |
|
BEML |
Q1 EBITDA Loss: ₹480M vs Loss ₹500M (YoY) (Reduced loss) |
Bad Performance
|
Company |
Key Metrics |
|
KIRI INDUSTRIES |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹101M vs ₹922M (YoY) |
|
ASTRAL |
Q1 Cons Net Profit: ₹811M vs ₹1.2B (YoY) <br> Q1 Revenue: ₹13.6B vs ₹13.84B (YoY) |
|
Company / News |
Q1 Performance Summary |
Category |
|
El Cid Investments |
Net Profit ₹706M vs Loss ₹195M, Revenue ₹920M vs -₹175M |
Very Good |
|
TVS Supply Chain Solutions |
Net Profit ₹712M vs ₹75M, Revenue ₹25.9B vs ₹25.4B |
Very Good |
|
Fusion Finance |
Net Loss ₹922.5M vs Loss ₹356.2M, Revenue ₹4.22B vs ₹6.21B |
Very Good* (improved loss) |
|
Banco Products |
EBITDA ₹1.9B vs ₹1.3B, Margin 20.50% vs 16.52% |
Very Good |
|
Trump Statement |
Says Russia-Ukraine War might end soon |
Very Good |
|
ASM Technologies |
Net Profit ₹156M vs ₹31M, Revenue ₹1.23B vs ₹526M, EBITDA ₹257M vs ₹38M, Margin 20.91% vs 7.30% |
Very Good |
|
AFCONS Infrastructure |
Net Profit ₹1.36B vs ₹1.03B (YoY), Revenue ₹33.6B vs ₹31.3B, EBITDA ₹4.34B vs ₹3.67B, Margin 12.91% vs 11.73% |
Good |
|
Camlin Fine Sciences |
Net Loss ₹100M vs Loss ₹340M, Revenue ₹4.23B vs ₹3.8B |
Good |
|
Star Cement |
Net Profit ₹985M vs ₹310M |
Good |
|
Ramco Systems |
Net Profit ₹9.4M vs Loss ₹197M, Revenue ₹1.61B vs ₹1.36B, EBITDA ₹290M vs ₹34.4M, Margin 18.01% vs 2.51% |
Good |
|
Vindhya Telelinks |
Net Profit ₹586M vs ₹294M, Revenue ₹9.1B vs ₹8.3B |
Good |
|
Market Activity |
FII Buy ₹1,932.81 Cr, DII Buy ₹7,723.66 Cr |
Good |
|
Sharda Motor Industries |
Net Profit ₹999M vs ₹768M, Revenue ₹7.56B vs ₹6.85B |
Good |
|
Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals |
EBITDA ₹1.16B vs ₹738M, Margin 10.55% vs 7.55% |
Good |
|
Mishtann Foods |
EBITDA ₹842M vs ₹731M, Margin 21.81% vs 19.09% |
Good |
|
Max Estates |
Net Profit ₹114M vs ₹16M, Revenue ₹515M vs ₹405M |
Good |
|
Yatra Online |
EBITDA ₹231M vs ₹46M, Margin 11% vs 4.55% |
Good |
|
Manappuram Finance |
Interim Dividend ₹0.50/share |
Bad |
|
Grasim Industries |
Net Loss ₹1.2B vs Loss ₹521M |
Bad |
|
Wockhardt |
Net Loss ₹900M vs Loss ₹140M |
Bad |
|
Equitas Small Finance Bank |
Net Loss ₹2.2B vs Profit ₹258M |
Bad |
|
ImagicaaWorld Entertainment |
EBITDA ₹661M vs ₹1.08B, Margin 48.12% vs 60.28% |
Bad |
|
Shipping Corporation of India |
EBITDA ₹4.9B vs ₹5.1B, Margin 37.16% vs 33.66%, Net Profit ₹3.54B vs ₹2.9B, Revenue ₹13B vs ₹15B |
Bad |
|
Manappuram Finance |
Net Profit ₹1.38B vs ₹5.55B, Revenue ₹22.62B vs ₹24.9B |
Very Bad |
|
Puravankara |
Net Loss ₹684M vs ₹154M, Revenue ₹5.2B vs ₹6.6B |
Very Bad |